Detroit saved America. America hung Detroit from a tree.


If you live in Detroit, then you know what it is to both love and hate a city at the same time.  One day you beat yourself senseless wondering why everybody else seems to be leaving town and you’re still here waiting for the heavens to drop down a miracle. But then the next day, even though the miracle probably hasn’t shown up yet, something happens to make you remember why, for those of us who love the city, Detroit is always worth it.

And sometimes it takes the voice of someone from outside the city to shake you up a bit and remind you about why your love is not in vain. It’s hard to find your way out of the belly of the beast, and sometimes it feels like you’ve been trapped down there so long swimming in a stew of vomit and despair that you begin to believe this is just the way life is. You start to believe that it’s not going to ever get any better than this because it has forever been thus.

Except that it hasn’t. Because if it hadn’t been for Detroit…? Man, it’s hard to know where to begin about what America would have lost if you subtract the contributions of the Motor City. No, not just putting America on wheels. I’m talking about Motown. And Alice Cooper. And Ron Carter. and James Carter. And Kronk Boxing. And I’m talking about the empowered middle class which Detroit helped create. And you can’t talk about that, about how the little guy was finally given the means to become something more than the footstool for the Big Guy, without talking about the unions. The same unions that everyone now seems to hate.

But if you know the truth, then the truth will let you see…

Sometimes you just have to say that, to let people know. And when I look back on some of my angry tirades in recent weeks because of what’s been going on with the Big Three and whether or not we would be granted the right to survive based on whether or not the Big Three got their acts together, I have to stop and realize that this isn’t all I feel about my city. Not by a longshot. Sure, I think the Big Three are paying for a wealth of screwups which is why they’ve been raked over the coals. But as has been made so plain by many more careful critics, there is no way the Big Three screwed up more than Wall Street. Not even a close contest.And that is soemthing I should have pointed out from the get-go without letting my anger get in the way.

Because if you want to compare what Wall Street has contributed toward the betterment of America and then actually try and stand that up next to what the American Auto industry has done? What Detroit has done?

I mean seriously. Does Wall Street even want to get in the ring with Detroit?

All of which brings me to this article you really ought to read from Business Week. I heard the author Ed Wallace talking on NPR this morning so I looked up the article, and this just spells it out better than just about anyone else I’ve read recently. Check it out…

Can America Survive Without Detroit?

Columnist Ed Wallace argues that letting Detroit fail would cripple not only America’s economy but also its psyche

America thinks it’s debating the logic of bailing out Detroit, but what we are actually talking about is the future of American manufacturing.

In the current financial mess, General Motors (GM), Ford Motor (F), and Chrysler find themselves unable to sell enough cars to survive into a potentially brighter future. Judging by what’s being said in the press, in Congress, and by some of the most respected names in American business, the nation’s response so far is a big “who cares?” I hate to point out distressing realities, but we ought to care. And yet, as is true of most of these national crises that seem to be cropping up far more often than they should be, the reporting and explaining of Detroit’s jam seem to demonstrate both a profound disregard for facts and little understanding of the interconnected macroeconomics that empower or destroy our civilized world.

Let me ask you two questions:

1. Do you believe we should lend Detroit $50 billion to save itself from this economic turmoil?

2. Do you believe that we should lend the American economy $50 billion to save it for you and your children?

Not incidentally, those two questions might actually be the same.

Comparing Apples to Squid

Some heavy hitters in business and politics have weighed in recently on whether or not Detroit should be helped through this critical period. Jack and Suzy Welch were given column space in BusinessWeek, and the argument they laid out was both intelligent and thoughtful. Still, the Welches judge that Detroit’s companies would be best served by reorganizing in federal bankruptcy courts, one day to emerge as lean, mean fighting machines. They say this would be the only way to “galvanize real change.”

The Welches point out that many Americans fly on bankrupt airlines without giving it a second thought. To their point of logic, a Detroit bankruptcy would not harm consumer demand for their products and wouldn’t lead to sales falling faster than the companies could be downsized.

But there is a huge difference between buying a $300 ticket on a bankrupt airline and signing a five- or six-year note on a new car for $25,000. If the bankrupt airline is flying that day, you can be fairly sure you’ll reach your destination—as has in fact been the case with carriers such as Delta Air Lines (DAL), United Airlines (UAUA), and others while they were in bankruptcy. But not knowing whether a major repair would be possible, or covered, on an automobile years in the future would certainly send most potential buyers looking elsewhere for their next ride.

Detroit has it right: If its automakers declare bankruptcy, the likelihood of their emerging as viable businesses is near zero. Their sales will fall faster than they can reorganize.

Look for the Hand

A more vocal critic of Detroit has turned out to be failed Presidential candidate Mitt Romney. The former businessman has strong ties to Detroit, being the son of former Michigan Governor and American Motors Chairman George W. Romney, but his opinion piece in The New York Times on Nov. 19 was so factually challenged that you almost couldn’t read it without feeling sorry for him. Romney talks of “insurmountable labor and retiree burdens, technology atrophy and product inferiority.” Of course, setting aside money for the retirees’ benefit packages should have been taken care of years ago, but apparently he missed the fact that a new contract was drawn up with the United Auto Workers last year that allows new hires in many positions to be paid as little as $14 an hour.

The significance of that was lost on most, but for the first time since World War I we will have people building automobiles in America who won’t be able to afford the vehicles they build. Somehow we are led to believe that’s real progress.

Romney goes on to discuss how Detroit’s labor costs keep it from matching Japanese quality and automotive value one-on-one, comparing a Ford Taurus with a Toyota Avalon. Discussing the labor cost burden for Ford, Romney speculates that there is a $2,000 cost disadvantage for Ford. He says this lets Toyota (TM) add $2,000 worth of quality and features to its Avalon, making it the far more appealing purchase and the better value. Again, there’s a fundamental flaw in his premise that five minutes’ research could have corrected: In spite of the $2,000 “labor burden” he mentions on the Taurus, its list price is still $3,720 less than the Avalon’s.

Using his logic, it’s Ford that could add that unknown extra $2,000 worth of features and quality to the Taurus and still sell it for $1,720 less than the Avalon. Both get 28 miles to the gallon on the highway; the Avalon gets 1 mpg more in city driving.

One other important thing: So far this year, 46,167 Tauruses have been sold, down 20.2% from a year ago, while Toyota has sold 37,852 of the Avalon—down 37.9%. So, if he really understood what he was saying, Romney’s position should have been: Why is the Avalon not selling better?

He also asserts: “[Detroit] management as is must go. New faces should be recruited from unrelated industries.” Great idea, Mitt. Let’s pick two of the best-known and most respected American corporations from which to pull the new leaders for Detroit. Say, Boeing (BA) and General Electric (GE)? While you were out campaigning, Ford and Chrysler already did that.

Imagine No Amber Waves

The media make much of the fact that Detroit’s dealerships so greatly outnumber Toyota’s. This extremely inefficient distribution chain, they say, weakens the average dealer, which in turn damages Detroit. To some degree that may be true, but what the media fail to take into account is how urban-centric that argument is.

One of the key reasons the Big Three have so many dealerships is that they have outlets in cities where Nissan (NSANY), Honda (HMC), or Toyota can’t claim any type of business. Detroit’s trucks may be taking a pounding right now in the press, but let Detroit go away and see what happens to American agribusiness.

That’s right: Detroit has a strong presence across the Great American Midwest. In states like Kansas you will find GM dealers in no fewer than 54 counties, while Toyota dealerships can be found in only eight. The reality is that after a few planting seasons, given reasonable crop prices on the commodities market, one day sales of new pickup trucks will again make more money for Detroit than all of the Chevy Volts they may or may not make.

And are you really suggesting that American farmers be given the choice of Tundras or Titans in the future? What a wonderful parting gift for Japan.

One would think the media might be a bit more sympathetic to this crisis, given how many of that industry’s jobs hinge on the outcome. After all, there are years when total automotive advertising can reach upwards of $15 billion annually. But not this year; and already we are seeing jobs melting away in the media—from radio stations to TV and with print publications—because of this automotive downturn. Let Detroit go away, and you’re talking about a decade-long drought for the Fourth Estate.

Not to mention the impact it would have on professional sports. GM has already pulled sponsorships at some Nascar tracks and dropped the Super Bowl. In Dallas, Cowboys owner Jerry Jones is finishing up a $1 billion stadium; the almost $5 million he receives annually to make the Ford F-Series the official truck of the Dallas Cowboys could be critical income lost.

Why We Must Care

Additionally, if Detroit fails, the impact on the American psyche in tough economic times could be devastating. Letting Detroit fail will cost us far more than saving it—and the collateral damage will be far worse than anyone has yet imagined. If we are in the last days of Detroit, we will pay for it anyhow—with no chance of getting any of our money, or any of America’s pride, back.

Detroit’s pensions will go under the government-backed Pension Benefit Guaranty Corp., which will in time overwhelm that agency. Retired auto workers’ health care will become a huge drain on our Medicare system, further straining its meager resources, while Detroit’s displaced workers will start collecting unemployment. We will lose the income tax revenue from their workers, not to mention the tax revenue from their suppliers’ workers, and so on down the line as they all become unemployed. And they won’t have much if anything besides food stamps to spend, so there goes all that sales tax and interest income, too.

Cutting Off Our Nose to Spite Our Face

Let me make something perfectly clear: Detroit did not cause this current problem to happen. The automakers are as much victims of this period of financial deleveraging as you and I are. We were led here by 28 years of new government rules moving us toward “anything goes” capitalism—and that brand should never have been confused with American capitalism, in which laws protect buyer and seller and whose dealings are characterized by integrity, honesty, and sanity. I am an American capitalist, and I believe ours is the best economic system in the world—when its rules are not being bypassed for private gain and the public’s loss.

But I’ll give it to you straight: Let Detroit fail and we may not be able to stop the avalanche that has been burying people and businesses all year long. If you don’t want to save Detroit, that’s your ideology. But are you willing to risk America?

Americans love underdogs but hate losers. Bankruptcy would move Detroit into the latter column, and America wouldn’t be far behind.

Ed Wallace is a recipient of the Gerald R. Loeb Award for business journalism, given by the Anderson School of Business at University of California at Los Angeles, and is a member of the American Historical Society. His column leads the Fort Worth Star-Telegram‘s “Sunday Drive” section. He reviews new cars every Friday morning at 7:15 on Fox Four’s Good Day, contributes articles to BusinessWeek Online, and hosts the top-rated talk show Wheels Saturdays from 8 a.m. to 1 p.m. on 570 KLIF.


~ by Keith A. Owens on December 11, 2008.

5 Responses to “Detroit saved America. America hung Detroit from a tree.”

  1. I read an article today about how easy it was for the government to bail out the banks, and how the auto industry has to fight tooth and nail for some assistance…one of the commenters said something that struck home with me. They said something to the effect of how we can go and give money to all of these big corporations in order for them to line their pockets, but we can’t help the auto industry that helps the average person feed their family? It just made me stop and think for a moment…

  2. It all about what have you done for me lately, thats the American way.

    The big three made their beds with the help of the unions.

    Hell the south is drooling at the idea of them going under because that means more jobs in non union friendly states.

  3. Marvalus,
    That’s the whole point right there. It’s not that the auto industry hasn’t made their mistakes because they certainly have. But for Congress to hold the car companies to so much of a higher standard than the car companies is unconscionable.

    It’s true the Big Three made their bed, and it’s true the unions have played their role. You know I was screaming at them several posts ago. But one thing I’ve also come to realize is that the few more jobs they will have in the South cannot in any way compensate for the devastation that will be visited on this economy if the Big Three crash. And also, just like I was telling Marvalus, it’s wrong for them to put a fire under the Big 3 but to let Wall Street and the banks get cash with no questions asked and no strings. There is absolutely no justification for that. The Southern Republicans are playing partisanship to a degree that they’re willing to risk this nation’s – not just Detroit’s – economy, and that is sick.

  4. Detroit isn’t failing because it is someone’s “fault”. Detroit is failing because of the cycle of creative destruction in capitalism. On the upswing, everything feels great, businesses are expanding, people have money to spend, clubs are filled with lines waiting outside, and there are always new faces appearing in town. But the down side is bleak: businesses are shrinking, no one has much money to spend, clubs are empty, and more and more familiar faces are disappearing. Technology and business models change. Nothing can be rescued from the past except displays for museums. If there is a future, it lies in new technologies and new business models.

    See my post:

    Best wishes,

    Nick Nielsen

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: